the_eggwhite: (Default)
[personal profile] the_eggwhite
My manager just came in and said something along the lines of "You know, I think that from now on we'll have the clients work with the Editoral Officer to plan their content before you get directly involved in the project. You just work with the editorial officer to make sure you stay informed and can put input in as required. Do you think that'll be best?"

No of course I don't think it'd be best! I've been saying we should do just that ever since we got an editorial officer purely out of my sense of perverse whimsy!

I've been explaining for this long that it's been simply a waste of time for me to be involved in projects too early because anything I do before the nature of the content is known will only have to be re-done when we find out! Now she's finally caught on.

The slight problem, however, is that she's twigged this today, which presents a slight hitch in the plan.

As of yesterday, we don't have an editorial officer anymore!

2005-06-24 11:24 (UTC)
by [identity profile] urizen.livejournal.com
It's like some kind of anti-genius.

2005-06-24 11:26 (UTC)

2005-06-24 11:37 (UTC)
by [identity profile] majic13.livejournal.com
Fantastic.

She needs some kind of award or something.

2005-06-24 11:38 (UTC)
cryx: me showing off hair done by a stylist from paris (Default)
by [personal profile] cryx
d'oh!!!!

hey.. get darren the job, he's good at editing stuff ;)

2005-06-24 11:50 (UTC)
by [identity profile] eggwhite.livejournal.com
I'll point the job ad around generally when it's been written...

Although I've just looked at the roehampton jobs website thinger to see what's up and we're advertising LOADS at the moment... There's also some internals which may go external if they're not filled (a software trainer and a records auditor)

March 2018

M T W T F S S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627 28293031 

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags